Topic: Colonialism and Neutral Parties
Choose 1 of the 2 prompts below on which to comment.
1. The Colonialist model ostensibly recognizes the value of psychology, but it does not typically result in deep engagement with the findings or methods of psychology. How might this be applied to a topic such as eating disorders or depression? What would be some of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach?
2. Entwistle distinguishes between scriptural authority and theological interpretation. Do you agree? Why might this distinction be important? Support your view with an example.
At least 3 citations, 1 of them from the textbook: Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, The Bible, and a Scholarly Journal Article