Question: Discuss the team dynamics for a highly effective or ineffective team of which you were a member. Can you explain why the team performed so well or so poorly?
Need minimum 250 words
Need minimum 3 APA references
No Plagiarism please
Need 1 Response to the below Discussion:
Excellent team dynamics manages to hold as the outcome of crucial operators, versus something that you can instantly discuss. We are supposing to view and examine the important determinants of team building to examine differences during the execution. Some of the important pointers/details in Team Dynamics are:
Leadership: the team should hold a definite leader who is approving, and team members should have faith in the lead. Without decent leadership furthermore authority, various teams distribute into concise practical methods of productivity. Empowerment implies a operator of continuous urge for groups of all dimensions.
Tasks and Duties Tuned to Strength: every team member need to know everything like what his/her responsibilities and duties signify and their engagement towards specific teams and leader should recognize further enable individual capabilities. Clarity and insight serve honor to others on the specific team also being a group. Without definite ideas about what any person in a group, do not consider a sense of direction. This commences to drop productivity furthermore raised negativity (Hale., (2012)).
Assessable Intentions and Goals: There must be clear KPI’s for progress. They need to turn to company-wide leadership therein obeying a greater faith. Every individual of a capable team understands what their intentions imply and what they desire to accomplish. KPI’s furthermore the tools are required to measure them, several times teams miss control. Without control, laziness and resignation will sneak within your organization (Maznevski, (2000)).
Ethan Hale. (2012). The 6 Group Dynamics Of High-Performing Teams Retrieved from www.fastcompany.com: https://www.fastcompany.com/1842891/6-group-dynamics-high-performing-teams
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization science, 11(5), 473-492.
Need minimum 125 words