week 4 discussions 5

Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for each question. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate with their own references. Please provide short but thorough sentences.

Supporting material: Attached

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/FINDING_PRIVACY_IN_THE_GLOBAL_.html

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/28…

Question #1:

What are the benefits and the compliance risk concerns with storing the organization’s data in the cloud?

What is the balance between efficiency and deprioritizing of privacy?

Is more regulatory intervention necessary?

Kesan, Hayes, and Bashir stated “[t]he market forces peering into private lives may not be doing so with malicious intentions, but the corresponding decrease in consumer control of their personal information is nonetheless harmful” (p. 471). To what degree do you think this statement is accurate?

Question #2:

The government has requested that your organization provide personal/customer user information in order to investigate a crime. The Board of Directors has asked the Compliance and Ethics Department to provide an argument for and against providing this information. Please provide an argument supporting each of these positions.

Question #3:

Of the various approaches to improving teamwork presented in the readings, which do you think is most effective? What experiences have you had that leads you to that conclusion?

Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.

Case Discussion Rubric (2016)

Case Discussion Rubric (2016)

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting

Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.