case response 5

Consider the cases “Pepsi’s Burma Connection” & “Levi Strauss & Co. and China.” Levi Strauss and Pepsi are each trying to strike a balance between profit and protecting human rights (HR) (or at least corporate image) while still participating in the nations where human rights abuses are certainly taking place.

1. Can a business operate ethically in an area that condones HR abuses? If so, how?
2. What is our responsibility, as consumers, towards people suffering HR abuses in foreign lands? (For example, do we have any duties towards them? Should we be concerned about the consequences (for them) of our actions?)
3. Should government relieve the temptation to participate in HR abuses through law (trade embargo, etc)? Why or why not?

[Though this assignment has several parts, do not answer it with a list or outline. Your reading responses should always be written in coherent paragraphs.]

Please use the attached cases as the sources.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.